Mailchimp vs Beehiiv: which platform fits you better
Mailchimp is the legacy giant. Beehiiv is the modern challenger. Both work, but they optimise for different kinds of senders. Here is how to pick.
Mailchimp and Beehiiv occupy different ends of the email-platform market. Mailchimp is the broad, mature platform built originally for small business marketing. Beehiiv is the newer, narrower platform built specifically for newsletter creators. Both work. The question is which fits your model.
Here is the honest framework for choosing.
What each platform is built for
Mailchimp is twenty-plus years old and reflects that history. It started as a tool for small businesses doing email marketing, expanded into a broader marketing platform with landing pages, social posting, audience CRM features, and ecommerce automation, and now serves a long tail of customer types from solo creators to mid-sized companies. It is wide and feature-rich, sometimes to a fault.
Beehiiv was founded in 2021 by alumni of the Morning Brew newsletter business. The product is opinionated and content-focused, built specifically for people whose primary asset is a newsletter and who often monetise through advertising, recommendations, and paid subscriptions. The feature set is narrower and deeper in that space.
If you simplify it: Mailchimp is built for "I run a small business and need to send marketing email." Beehiiv is built for "my newsletter is the product."
Pricing
Both have free tiers. Both scale up with subscriber count.
Mailchimp's free tier is meaningful but caps at relatively low subscriber counts and fewer monthly sends. Paid plans (Essentials, Standard, Premium) move into normal-business pricing reasonably quickly.
Beehiiv's free tier supports more subscribers initially but includes platform branding in the email. Paid plans (Scale, Max, Enterprise) tend to be more cost-effective at higher subscriber counts than Mailchimp's equivalents, particularly above 25,000 subscribers.
The price differential is small at small list sizes. It widens at scale, mostly in Beehiiv's favour for pure newsletter use cases. Always check current pricing on each platform's site directly because both update plans periodically.
Where Mailchimp is stronger
Breadth of features. Mailchimp does landing pages, surveys, social posts, basic ecommerce automations, postcards, and a long list of integrations. If you want one tool to handle marketing across multiple channels, Mailchimp does this well.
Established integrations. Twenty years of partnership history means Mailchimp integrates with almost every CRM, ecommerce platform, and analytics tool you might use. Shopify, WooCommerce, Salesforce, HubSpot, Zapier, and a long tail of niche connectors all work natively.
Audience and CRM features. Mailchimp's audience-management tools (segmentation, behavioural automations, predictive demographics) are mature and powerful. If you have a database of customers with lots of behavioural data, Mailchimp can do meaningful work with it.
Branding for non-newsletter brands. Mailchimp's templates and landing pages look like marketing materials, which is what most non-newsletter business users want.
Reliability at scale. Mailchimp has been delivering high volumes of email for two decades. Deliverability infrastructure is mature.
Where Beehiiv is stronger
Native monetisation for newsletters. The Boost network, native ad slots, paid subscriptions, and recommendations engine are all built into the platform. If your model is "build an audience, sell ads or sponsorships," Beehiiv removes friction Mailchimp does not even attempt.
Publication-style site. Every Beehiiv newsletter gets a public archive at a default subdomain or custom domain that looks like a magazine, not a generic email archive. This is meaningful for SEO and for social sharing of content.
Editor experience. The writing UI is closer to what newsletter writers expect. Block-based, clean, with good handling of embeds (polls, links, images, video). Mailchimp's editor is functional but visibly older.
Referral programmes. Beehiiv's built-in referral tools (tier-based rewards, share counts, milestone tracking) are stronger than what Mailchimp offers natively. If you plan to grow your list through reader referrals, this matters.
Modern defaults. Authentication, analytics, deliverability tools all reflect 2020s best practices without manual configuration.
Where they are roughly equal
Deliverability. Both are competent senders. Neither has a meaningful edge in raw delivery rates if you set up authentication properly on either.
Subscriber import and migration. Both let you move a list in or out without major friction.
Compliance basics. Both handle GDPR, CAN-SPAM, and the major regulatory baselines.
Mobile experience. Both have apps for managing your newsletter on the go. Both work fine.
Some scenarios
A few honest pattern matches.
You run a small business and email is one of several marketing channels. You want one tool to handle email, landing pages, simple automations, and integration with your ecommerce or CRM. Mailchimp. It is broader, the integrations are mature, and the feature set covers more of your needs.
You are an independent creator or media business where the newsletter is the product. You want native monetisation, a magazine-style public site, and writer-friendly editing. Beehiiv. It is built for exactly this and the newer platform shows in the experience.
You are a small B2B services business using email as one channel among several, with the goal of drip-feeding existing customers and prospects. Mailchimp is probably easier because the audience and behavioural features matter more than the publication features.
You are starting a paid newsletter, with the long-term plan of monetising through subscriptions, sponsorships, and recommendations. Beehiiv. The native infrastructure for those models is materially better.
You run an ecommerce store and need email marketing tightly integrated with the storefront. Mailchimp is workable but probably not the best choice; consider Klaviyo or Shopify Email instead. Both Mailchimp and Beehiiv are second-choice tools for this use case.
You run a non-profit, association, or community newsletter where reach and consistency matter more than monetisation. Either works. The decision usually comes down to cost at your subscriber count and how much you value the magazine-style archive (Beehiiv) versus the broader feature set (Mailchimp).
Where ContentCrab fits
The platform you choose is the place you send from. The content engine that generates the newsletter content is a different question.
ContentCrab pulls articles from your industry sources, scores them for relevance, and helps you generate a draft newsletter in your voice. You then send via Mailchimp, Beehiiv, or whatever ESP you prefer.
For more comparisons, see ContentCrab vs Mailchimp, ContentCrab vs Beehiiv, and Beehiiv vs ConvertKit.
The honest decision rule
Most senders overthink this choice. Both platforms are good. Neither will materially limit a serious newsletter under one hundred thousand subscribers.
The deciding question is: is your newsletter the product, or is your newsletter one of several marketing tools?
If it is the product, Beehiiv. If it is a tool, Mailchimp.
Pick one and start sending. The platform matters less than the consistency of shipping.
Cheers.